Abortion bans defy the laws of nature and reality.
That which is and never was free, does not have freedoms to protect. From the moment of conception until birth a ZEF is a resident of its mother, and is naturally dependent on her will to survive and thrive. This includes being subject to both the needs of her involuntary bodily processes and her whims. In best cases her will is charitable to the cause of reproduction, but sometimes it simply may not be.
There is no more natural, fundamental, or legitimate form of society or bodily social union than sex, conjoined twins, and pregnancy. Sex does not involve a necessary dependency, whereas conjoined twins may and pregnancy absolutely does. We can see clearly in our distinction between a conjoined twin and a parasitic twin that in instances where only one twin has a clear advantage of self-reliant function their will is prioritized over the life of the other. Pregnancy similarly can only be governed by the conscious and unconscious presiding will of the gestating body, including the mother's rational self-interest.
Pregnancy is the original and only typical natural form of government in existence, with the mother its executive sovereign.
There is no more legitimate law-maker anywhere than a pregnant woman setting the terms for her and her offspring's survival, and any that claim to be or would seek to overthrow her law simply are falsely flattering their authority and making the presumption that they know better than the laws of nature. Do not believe them, and if you are one check your ego.
Abortion Bans Are Objectively Morally Bad
Objective moral worth can only apply to things that are universally good.
If in some cases a conception leads only to a woman suffering and wishing she wasn't pregnant and she ultimately miscarries, that conception did no good. Ergo conception is not objectively morally good.
If a pregnancy carried unwillingly only causes a woman to suffer for its entirety and both she and her child dies in labor, that pregnancy did no good. Ergo pregnancy is not objectively morally good.
A mother giving birth to a living baby unwillingly only does one person good. Ergo unwilling birth is not objectively morally good.
A healthy mom willingly giving birth to a living baby does both parties good. Ergo giving birth willingly to a living baby is objectively morally good.
A government can't protect something that is not objectively morally good at someone else's expense and be a good government, ergo abortion bans are objectively bad.
Abortion Bans seek to usurp a sovereign government - that of a mother and her child - for the purpose of moral imperialism. Members of the UN must respect a sovereign state. Ergo abortion bans are a war crime and objectively bad according to American ideals.
Religious / Christian Faith Argument
In simplest terms, God created us according to His design, and who are you to question that?
He designed the state of pregnancy, and the authority it naturally demands. To oppose a woman's natural authority over her ZEF is sacrilegious. To blaspheme God's evidently natural law in an attempt to subjugate another human is not to fall from grace but to willingly leap from it.
If your objection is the commandments - God created us before he issued the commandment, and how could he command something in contradiction to his perfectly created state of pregnant authority? This is legalism, again, a fall from the grace of God.
If you seek salvation, change your views and repent.
Naturalization Paradox
1. A ZEF is naturally not free in its dependency on its mother.
2. If you naturalize a ZEF to protect it under the law, it would also obligate it under the law.
3. You are not completely free if you have legal obligations.
4. In naturalizing the ZEF you have effectively ensured it will be born enslaved to the country in providing it with legal freedoms that would simultaneously deprive it of all freedoms because freedom can't exist where one never was allowed to be free from obligation.
No comments:
Post a Comment